Ar esate matę britų mokslinės fantastikos antologinį serialą "Juodasis veidrodis"? Jei taip, tikriausiai pagalvojote: "Dieve mano, tai tikrai galėjo nutikti realiame gyvenime." Jie naudoja mobiliąją programėlę, kuri seka jūsų gyvenimą ir palieka įvertinimą, kaip elgiatės. Pavyzdžiui, jei viršijate greitį arba su kuo nors ginčijatės, jūsų balas sumažėja. Dėl to bankai gali atsisakyti suteikti kreditą. Ar galite įsivaizduoti, kad kai kuriuose Kinijos miestuose tai jau daroma?!
Daugelis programuotojų svarsto, kaip sukurti socialinį tinklą, kuris žmonėms atneštų realios naudos. Įkvėpti juodojo veidrodžio filmo "Nosis", kaip galėtų atrodyti socialinis tinklas, kuris įvertintų jus ES? Ar tai geras verslo idėja? Ar tai galėtų tapti 1 mlrd. dolerių vertės verslu? Sužinokime!
Nusileidimas: "Juodasis veidrodis", 3 sezonas, 1 epizodas
Galbūt netrukus gyvensime naujoje realybėje, kurioje didžioji mūsų gyvenimo dalis priklausys nuo to, kaip mus vertina kiti. Jūsų socialinis reitingas turi apčiuopiamą poveikį galimybėms ir prabangai, kurią galite sau leisti. Jūsų reitingas lemia jūsų socialinę klasę, tačiau jis taip pat turi įtakos ir labiau apčiuopiamiems jūsų gyvenimo aspektams, pvz:
- nuoma;
- darbas;
- medicininis gydymas;
- pasimatymų galimybes ir kt.
Garsiajame televizijos seriale "Juodasis veidrodis" (angl. Black Mirror) rodomas veiksmas retai vyksta tolimoje ateityje. Dažniausiai vienintelis realus skirtumas, kurį galima pastebėti, yra unikalios technologijos, į kurias atkreipiamas dėmesys epizode.
Lacey Pound gyvena pasaulyje, kuriame draugai ir nepažįstami žmonės gali jus įvertinti penkiabalėje skalėje. Jie naudojasi mobiliuosiuose telefonuose ir "išmaniuosiuose lęšiuose" įmontuotomis technologijomis. Šios technologijos daro įtaką ne tik kiekvieno žmogaus kasdieniam gyvenimo būdui, bet ir jo padėčiai visuomenėje. Žmonės, kurių įvertinimas yra mažesnis nei 2,5 balo, priklauso žemiausiai klasei. Lacey, kuri įnirtingai nori, kad ji visiems patiktų, šiuo metu gali pasigirti įspūdingu 4,2 balo reitingu. Ji gyvena su savo vaikinu Ryanu, kurio reitingas žemesnis, nes jis nesirūpina savo socialine išvaizda. Jų nuomos laikotarpis netrukus baigsis, ir Lacey svajoja persikelti į kitą vietą. Lacey sužino, kad jos reitingas turi būti 4,5 balo arba aukštesnis, norint gauti prabangų butą. Štai čia ir prasideda nuotykiai!
Ar galėtumėte įsivaizduoti tokią situaciją mūsų realybėje? Tuo tarpu visa tai jau egzistuoja. Taip, mes neturime "AR Vision" implantų, kurie rodytų kiekvieno žmogaus reitingą. Tačiau ši technologija jau pritaikyta keliuose Kinijos miestuose.
Social Credit System in China
The social rating divides all Chinese residents into four unequal castes:
– Class A citizens have the full range of rights.
– Category B has fewer rights.
– Class C citizens have even fewer rights.
– Class D is an absolute pariah, an analog of the untouchables in the Indian caste system.
China’s Social Credit System is a very ambitious initiative. The purpose is to create a database that tracks the behavior of individuals, companies, and governments. For positive public actions, participants receive a reward, and they are penalties for a low rating.
That is possible to increase your rating; a person needs to:
– donate blood;
– do volunteering;
– collect garbage separately, etc.
Of course, losing rating points is much easier than acquiring them.
The databases are managed by:
– Chinese economic planners;
– National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC);
– People’s Bank of China (PBOC);
– country’s judicial system.
The Chinese government is experimenting with video surveillance and real-time data transmission data collection. They collect most of the data from traditional sources:
– financial;
– criminal;
– government records;
– existing data from registry offices.
A good rating will lead to a reward, while a low rating can lead to punishment. Unreliable individuals may face some restrictions affecting different areas:
– loans;
– travel by plane or rail;
– education.
What will happen if they approve the Chinese social credit system in 2023? Will they transport China to a world of violent dystopias?
How could a social network that scores you look in the EU?
We have experienced a lot of fear of technology. If we live in a dystopia now, we seem to cope well with it. “Black Mirror” shows technological progress, which uses extreme scenarios to make us think about what we should do in the future. Is it possible to introduce a similar system in Europe?
The purpose of the system is to increase transparency for society. But it also serves as a government tool for controlling almost all aspects of our lives. The social credit rating usually provokes anger among Western commentators, and many of them think the social credit system looks like an authoritarian government.
The social rating system is based on two pillars:
– First, it is the ubiquitous penetration of the facial recognition system.
– Second, it is a presence of a person in many databases?banking, medical, police, which exchange information with each other in real-time.
Artificial intelligence technologies allow the processing of large amounts of data at a top speed. It is very tempting for the state to have analyzed information about the life of citizens, and it helps to understand what is happening to society, what its needs are, and what needs to be changed.
There is a great temptation to divide people into specific categories. For China, this path of social differentiation is understandable. But in other parts of the world, using a social rating system is unusual. It is an ambiguous solution that carries many hidden risks. And above all, it is the risk of losing personal freedom and the right to choose.
A person can slide to the bottom of the social pyramid without committing a single illegal act. Now the criteria of integrity are determined by laws. But by introducing a social rating, you can find yourself at the bottom of the pyramid. This is one of the most terrible risks.
Introducing any, even the most progressive innovations, always causes different opinions. This also applies to introducing social monitoring?there are pros and cons. Such social monitoring can be helpful for:
– planning;
– prevention of offenses;
– diagnosis of diseases.
There are psychological risks in the social rating system, and there are also substantial technological risks because the system is imperfect. Besides, the legal system is being pushed into the background. Are people in Europe ready for this?
The Future of Social Network
The most valuable categories are happiness and health. Are they determined by the class to which a person is assigned? No one can give us the benefit of being healthy or happy. And where is the measure of what will make us happy? One needs a lot of money to be satisfied, another needs the opportunity to make global decisions, and the third needs to create.
A person should be able to choose, and we should not violate it. You can sacrifice some freedoms, but you cannot deprive people of the right to choose. This is a significant psychological moment.
I don't think this is a good idea because I think this particular project will bring back segregation, WOW.
This article sounds fun at first but I think the rating of one's life could begin to take a toll and make someone feel judged on a constant basis.
ITS REALLY A USEFUL WEBSITE TO LEARN MORE